The Big Question: Can One Learn to Write Well?

Hello, everyone.  I’m not planning to do a lot of blogging today since I had a hell of a run on Friday and Saturday.  Also, I’m trying to revamp the first few chapters of “The Notice” taking into account the advice I received this weekend, while also making headway on “The Last Cup” and finishing up “Naked in Korea”.  In other words, I’ve got quite a bit on my plate.  However, I did want to adjust one thing that came up at the conference that I couldn’t help but think about last time during the brief moments when I wasn’t fuming over how awful most of “Prometheus” was.

A recurring question that comes up at almost any writers conference or on any writing website is whether or not writing is a thing that can be instructed.  Can it be learned?  As I mentioned, some of the speakers at the conference I attended in Lexington, KY left me wanting because I didn’t feel like their advice on writing was especially helpful.  Other people seemed equally dejected after a few of the lectures.  Then I began wondering what they possibly could have said that would have been truly useful.

Some people will tell you that writing, like painting, is an art that simply cannot be taught.  We cannot be instructed on how to feel with the sort of poignancy that defines all great art.  We cannot be taught how to observe the world in a way that is different or unexpected.  We cannot learn to be brilliantly insightful or discover from someone else how to unveil new truths in the world that were always there.  To me, the most we can hope for is that someone will tell us the buried treasure is out there, point us in the right direction, and send us off with a shovel.  Unfortunately, the map is up to us and some people have brilliantly detailed maps while others just have a napkin with a vague “X” on it.

That said, writing is a skill that can be improved.  I don’t think this can be argued.  Therefore, if a skill can be improved then it should be able to be learned in the first place.  Sounds logical, right?  What I would reinforce, however, is that it is not a skill that can be learned quickly.

I have been evolving as a writer since I was 10-years-old.  My evolution started with the first sci-fi short story I wrote at that age and which won a Young Author’s award when I was in elementary school and I kept evolving right up to my Governor’s Cup essay that won Third Place in a state-wide competition.  My evolution continued through the mountains of terrible poetry I wrote in middle school and high school—I penned one almost every single night—and kept going through every paper I wrote at Centre College from “C+” grades that I totally phoned in to “A+” breakthroughs that I slaved over for weeks.  In the years since Centre, my evolution has continued with a 300,000-word fantasy novel that will never see the light of day in that form for obvious reasons to a much more toned, trimmed, and nuanced book about Bosnia to the projects through which I am currently evolving.  The evolution never stops and I’m not even certain that it becomes all that faster, but it does last one’s entire life.

And when I wasn’t evolving through the things I was writing, I was evolving through the books I was reading.  I evolved the first time I read “The Oddkins” and I evolved the first time I read “The Hobbit” and “Lord of the Rings”.  I devolved with “Goosebumps” for a period, but evolved once more with “Flowers for Algernon” and “Death Be Not Proud” and “Black Like Me” and “Frankenstein”.  I kept evolving through Philip K. Dick and Barbara Kingsolver and Kurt Vonnegut and, more recently, Aldous Huxley.  You are only as good as the books you read and if you are not reading good books, you almost certainly will be unable to write your own.

So, yes, I believe one can be taught to write well.  One can even teach oneself to write well and, in truth, this might be the easier of the two.  It is simpler to refine one’s art than to teach someone else to do it, I believe.  However, that process has to start young if one wants to reach lofty goals.  I was astonished by the number of individuals at our conference who were in their 60s or 70s and only just learning how to write.  I could not conceive of the steepness of that curve.  It has taken me almost fifteen years to start producing what I consider to be good work.  That some of the people I met in Lexington were only just beginning their endeavors and admitted to have never really done much writing before was truly shocking to me.  I imagine those who will succeed must always have had something innate in them that would enable them to write—that unique voice or view of the world, for example—but others seem doomed to fail and I didn’t quite know what to say to them when they asked my opinion.

Failure is something I can accept only because I so enjoy the writing itself.  I could only hope that they feel the same way about their projects.  Some say writing can’t be learned, but I challenge you to do defy those expectations.  What I can tell you with absolute certainty, however, is that it won’t be easy.  It’s going to take a long time and more effort than 99% of people would be willing to invest.  I guess the question is how badly do you really want it.  I’ve been grappling with that since Page 1…

FILM REVIEW: PROMETHEUS (2012)

In space, no one can hear you scream about Guy Pearce’s make-up.

From time to time, I do plan to comment on films via this blog/site and I had always hoped to kick things off with a positive review of the movie “Prometheus”.  My wish came half true.  I am reviewing that film but not nearly with the sort of adoration or praise for which I had hoped.  “Prometheus” is an unrivaled visual work with cinematography often worthy of Terrence Malick (high praise, indeed) with solid performances, but unfortunately it descends midway into an expert seminar on how not to tell a story and how not to write characters & dialogue.

I will try to keep spoilers at a minimum.

Ridley Scott proves himself visually before the intro credits have even finished.  The opening scene is a lush and crisp montage of landscapes that appear both alien and earthly, alluding to the dichotomy of themes with which the movie’s story plays.  In that scene, the film delivers startlingly beautiful footage with just a dash of hokeyness that, thankfully, doesn’t overpower what Scott endeavors to film.  Unfortunately that hokeyness nags at almost every other scene throughout “Prometheus” almost like terrorists hijacking a bus and finally seems to wrestle away control of the steering wheel in the final act.

The story is a mess once “Prometheus” touches down on “token alien world”.  Flourishes of intriguing questions, incredible originality, and just plain geekishly awesome tech (the automated surgical bay was probably ripped straight out of “Dead Space 2″) hint at the film that could have been.  Unfortunately, those moments are stitched together by a movie that fails to integrate the thematic material to which it alludes (its blood runs deep with grandfather “At the Mountains of Madness” by H.P. Lovecraft) to any profound effect.  The end result is a story that riffs on better ideas without making them its own.  It’s a “2001″ mime with little of the power or grandiosity and traces of “Alien” that seem shoehorned into the equation to save a desperate movie.  If you ask me, reviews have been too kind to this one, but hopefully that praise and first-week earnings will redeem “Prometheus” with a superior sequel.

Then you have the casting, which is top-shelf for the most part.  Charlize Theron, Noomi Rapace, Idris Elba, Logan Marshall-Green (I think people will be wanting to see more of him after this), and Michael Fassbender do their best with what little they have (more on that in a moment).  Only Guy Pearce is a total WTF in casting.  Anyone who saw the YouTube teaser video featuring his character’s speech at TED can tell you that his performance delivered goose bumps.  Unfortunately, none of THAT version of his character made it into “Prometheus” (literally not one second).  Instead we’re left wondering why they couldn’t simply cast someone like Christopher Plummer in a rule that was clearly intended for an older person.  You’ll see what I mean if you’re unfortunate enough to make it to the second half of this movie.

Speaking of Guy Pearce, one could make the argument that “Prometheus” completely starts to unravel the moment he appears for the second time.  Much of the blame for this must surely fall on Damon Lindelof’s shoulders.  When you realize that “Prometheus” was written by the people who brought us “Cowboys & Aliens” and that awful “The Darkest Hour” flick from last year, it’s no wonder that “Prometheus” is a veritable “How NOT to” of writing.

SOME SPOILERS AHEAD

Let’s start at the top.  Irrelevant characters abound in “Prometheus”.  Two characters on the bridge exist for no reason other than to press buttons at Idris Elba’s command, shout cliched one-liners at each other, and ultimately to completely ruin Elba’s heroic final act by adding unnecessary banter about a stupid “bet” nobody in the audience was probably even paying attention to and definitely didn’t care about!  Of these two annoying characters, one seems to serve no purpose other than being Asian!  Other useless characters exist only to take off their helmets and be throat-raped by creatures, to be thrown into the air by creatures, to be bashed against things by creatures, to turn INTO creatures (for some unexplained reason that only occurs ONCE), and (of course) to be killed by creatures.  From a narrative standpoint, “Prometheus” wouldn’t even pass the smell test with 99% of literary agents, much less be the basis for a motion picture.

Then you have the final scene:  A shot that makes no sense, destroys everything else built up by the film, undermines the logic and established rules of a respected franchise, and ultimately spits in the face of its audience.  There is no closure (something with Lindelof obviously hates, which he expressed with “Lost”).  Instead we’re given a setup for a more interesting sequel to a movie that should never have been made in the first place.  It makes you wish that they had just made THAT movie with this cast.

What ultimately bugs me about this movie is that months ago I read a spoiler synopsis of “Prometheus” that had me amped.  The story was there and incorporated so many cool elements of “Alien”.  It offered a satisfying explanation for what the xenomorphs are.  It offered riveting character arcs for everyone on board.  WHY WASN’T THAT THE MOVIE THEY MADE?  Whoever wrote that fake synopsis should be making movies, not Damon Lindelof.  Here is the link to that synopsis:  http://boxofficebuz.com/news_full.php?id=287 Now, if you have seen “Prometheus”…Tell me that’s not the better movie.

Final Verdict:  3/10